SEC Filing | Greif, Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Quarterly Report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2008

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-00566

GREIF, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

31-4388903

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


425 Winter Road, Delaware, Ohio		43015
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (740) 549-6000

Not Applicable

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:


Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock at the close of business on April 30, 2008 was as follows:


Class A Common Stock		23,957,800 shares
Class B Common Stock		22,764,766 shares

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three months ended April 30,						Six months ended April 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net sales	$	918,019		$	815,043		$	1,764,311		$	1,565,802
Cost of products sold		758,851			672,512			1,456,819			1,293,185

Gross profit		159,168			142,531			307,492			272,617

Selling, general and administrative expenses		83,431			77,670			163,943			152,279
Restructuring charges		7,337			4,049			17,812			6,086
Timberland disposals, net		100			(382	)		190			(320	)
Gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net		12,971			3,448			49,745			8,587

Operating profit		81,471			63,878			175,672			122,519

Interest expense, net		13,296			10,046			25,052			22,080
Debt extinguishment charge		—			23,479			—			23,479
Other expense, net		(3,780	)		(4,327	)		(7,110	)		(5,063	)

Income before income tax expense and equity earnings and minority interests		64,395			26,026			143,510			71,897
Income tax expense		14,748			7,278			33,438			18,837
Equity earnings and minority interests		(993	)		(124	)		(731	)		(457	)

Net income	$	48,654		$	18,624		$	109,341		$	52,603


Basic earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	0.84		$	0.32		$	1.88		$	0.91
Class B Common Stock	$	1.25		$	0.48		$	2.81		$	1.36

Diluted earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	0.82		$	0.32		$	1.85		$	0.89
Class B Common Stock	$	1.25		$	0.48		$	2.81		$	1.36

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

ASSETS


	April 30, 2008			October 31, 2007
	(Unaudited)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	96,978		$	123,699
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $11,722 in 2008 and $12,539 in 2007		399,616			339,328
Inventories		288,000			242,994
Deferred tax assets		20,904			27,917
Net assets held for sale		15,952			11,564
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		109,225			96,283

		930,675			841,785


Long-term assets
Goodwill		539,446			493,252
Other intangible assets, net of amortization		104,271			96,256
Assets held by special purpose entities (Note 8)		50,891			50,891
Long-term notes receivable		3,363			36,434
Other long-term assets		57,524			59,547

		755,495			736,380


Properties, plants and equipment
Timber properties, net of depletion		198,941			197,235
Land		129,602			126,018
Buildings		366,744			356,878
Machinery and equipment		1,070,202			1,032,677
Capital projects in progress		125,860			90,659

		1,891,349			1,803,467
Accumulated depreciation		(786,634	)		(728,921	)

		1,104,715			1,074,546

	$	2,790,885		$	2,652,711

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY


	April 30, 2008			October 31, 2007
	(Unaudited)
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	379,014		$	411,095
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		73,500			84,977
Restructuring reserves		10,707			15,776
Short-term borrowings		47,679			15,848
Other current liabilities		136,204			121,214

		647,104			648,910


Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt		722,492			622,685
Deferred tax liabilities		74,822			159,494
Pension liability		19,287			19,892
Postretirement benefit liabilities		31,487			32,983
Liabilities held by special purpose entities (Note 8)		43,250			43,250
Other long-term liabilities		226,221			119,180

		1,117,559			997,484

Minority interest		6,424			6,405

Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, without par value		80,707			75,156
Treasury stock, at cost		(102,605	)		(92,028	)
Retained earnings		1,074,236			1,004,300
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
- foreign currency translation		(316	)		43,260
- interest rate derivatives		(2,782	)		(997	)
- energy and other derivatives		528			226
- minimum pension liability		(29,970	)		(30,005	)

		1,019,798			999,912

	$	2,790,885		$	2,652,711

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands)


For the six months ended April 30,	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	109,341		$	52,603
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		52,638			53,276
Asset impairments		10,236			939
Deferred income taxes		(77,659	)		27,081
Gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net		(49,745	)		(8,587	)
Timberland disposals, net (Note 8)		(190	)		320
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			23,479
Equity earnings and minority interests		731			457
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable		(40,544	)		17,479
Inventories		(29,004	)		(7,422	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(6,763	)		(28,587	)
Other long-term assets		(3,709	)		(81,506	)
Accounts payable		(19,162	)		(4,844	)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(13,294	)		(12,874	)
Restructuring reserves		(4,235	)		(4,117	)
Other current liabilities		31			(1,786	)
Pension and postretirement benefit liability		(2,101	)		(4,135	)
Other, including long-term liabilities		22,648			59,931

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(50,781	)		81,707


Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of companies, net of cash acquired		(66,605	)		(311,108	)
Purchases of properties, plants and equipment		(69,500	)		(74,225	)
Purchases of timber properties		(1,300	)		(400	)
Receipt (issuance) of notes receivable		33,178			(29,748	)
Proceeds from the disposal of properties, plants, equipment and other assets		51,440			13,122

Net cash used in investing activities		(52,787	)		(402,359	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		1,156,574			1,254,588
Payments on long-term debt		(1,072,834	)		(1,012,876	)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		29,996			46,552
Payment of premiums for extinguishment of debt		—			(14,303	)
Debt issuance costs		—			(2,839	)
Dividends paid		(32,391	)		(20,793	)
Acquisitions of treasury stock and other		(10,899	)		(5,338	)
Exercise of stock options		3,152			9,001

Net cash provided by financing activities		73,598			253,992

Effects of exchange rates on cash		3,249			(5,071	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(26,721	)		(71,731	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		123,699			187,101

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	96,978		$	115,370

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

April 30, 2008

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007 and the consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 of Greif, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”). These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 (the “2007 Form 10-K”).

The Company’s fiscal year begins on November 1 and ends on October 31 of the following year. Any references to the year 2008 or 2007, or to any quarter of those years, relates to the fiscal year or quarter, as the case may be, ending in that year.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.

Industrial Packaging Acquisitions and Divestitures

During the first six months of 2008, the Company completed three acquisitions of industrial packaging companies for an aggregate purchase price of $66.6 million. These three acquisitions consisted of a joint venture in the Middle East in November 2007, acquisition of a 70 percent interest in a South American company in November 2007, and the acquisition of a North American company in December 2007. These industrial packaging acquisitions are expected to complement the Company’s existing product lines that together will provide growth opportunities and scale. These acquisitions, included in operating results from the acquisition dates, were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The estimated fair values of the assets acquired were $33.7 million (including $15.9 million of accounts receivable and $8.2 million of inventory) and liabilities assumed were $8.2 million. Identifiable intangible assets, with a combined fair value of $9.5 million, including trade-names, customer relationships, and certain non-compete agreements, have been recorded for these acquisitions. The excess of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $31.6 million was recorded as goodwill. The final allocation of the purchase prices may differ due to additional refinements in the fair values of the net assets acquired as well as the execution of consolidation plans to eliminate duplicate operations, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” This is due to the valuation of certain other assets and liabilities that are subject to refinement and therefore the actual fair value may vary from the preliminary estimates. Adjustments to the acquired net assets resulting from final valuations are not expected to be significant. The Company is finalizing certain closing date adjustments with the sellers, as well as the allocation of income tax adjustments.

During 2007, the Company completed seven acquisitions of industrial packaging companies for an aggregate purchase price of $346.4 million. These seven acquisitions were Blagden Packaging Group, two small North American companies in November 2006, one small North African company in January 2007, the acquisition of the remaining ownership of two of our minority owned plants in Russia in July 2007, a North American joint venture in October 2007, and one small South American company in October 2007. These industrial packaging acquisitions are expected to complement the Company’s existing product lines that together will provide growth opportunities and scale. These acquisitions, included in operating results from the acquisition dates, were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The estimated fair values of the assets acquired were $139.2 million (including $61.2 million of accounts receivable and $43.5 million of inventory) and liabilities assumed were $52.5 million. Identifiable intangible assets, with a combined fair value of $56.4 million, including trade-names, customer relationships and certain non-compete agreements, have been recorded for these acquisitions. The excess of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $203.3 million was recorded as goodwill. The final allocation of the purchase prices for the last three 2007 acquisitions may differ due to additional refinements in the fair values of the net assets acquired as well as the execution of consolidation plans to eliminate duplicate operations, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” This is due to the valuation of certain other assets and liabilities that are subject to refinement and therefore the actual fair value may vary from the preliminary estimates. Adjustments to the acquired net assets resulting from final valuations are not expected to be significant. The Company is finalizing certain closing date adjustments with the sellers, as well as the allocation of income tax adjustments.

As of the completion date of the acquisitions made during the first six months of 2008, the Company had only begun to formulate various restructuring plans at certain of the acquired businesses discussed above. The Company’s restructuring plans for these newly acquired businesses preliminarily include plans to consolidate locations.

During 2007, the Company implemented various restructuring plans at certain of the acquired businesses discussed above that were previously in the planning and evaluation stages. As of the consummation date of the acquisitions, management began to assess and formulate plans to close certain acquired locations. The Company’s restructuring activities, which were accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination” (“EITF 95-3”), primarily have included reductions in staffing levels, other exit costs associated with the consolidation of certain management or sales and marketing personnel, and the reduction of excess capacity. In connection with these restructuring activities, as part of the cost of the above acquisitions, the Company established reserves, primarily for severance and excess facilities, in the amount of $11.7 million, of which $6.2 million remains in the restructuring reserve at April 30, 2008. These accruals have been recorded as liabilities to the opening balance sheets (increases to goodwill) pursuant to the provisions of EITF 95-3. These charges primarily reflect severance, other exit costs associated with the consolidation of certain sales and marketing personnel, and the reduction of excess capacity.

Had the transactions occurred on November 1, 2006, results of operations would not have differed materially from reported results.

During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold its Australian drum operations and 51 percent interest in its Zimbabwean drum operations. The net gain from these divestitures was $29.9 million and is included in gain on disposal of properties, plants, and equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. The sales in 2007 from these operations were $45.0 million and the 2007 net income from these operations was $2.1 million. Had these sales occurred at the beginning of the prior fiscal year, the October 31, 2007 earnings per share of Class A and Class B common stock would have been $2.66 and $3.98, respectively. The October 31, 2007 earnings per share as reported for Class A and Class B common stock were $2.69 and $4.04, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

On November 1, 2005, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense, based on estimated fair values, for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and participation in the Company’s employee stock purchase plan. In adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company used the modified prospective application transition method, as of November 1, 2005, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2006. There was no share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007.

SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of income over the requisite service periods. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the first three months of 2007 includes compensation expense for share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of November 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. No options have been granted in 2008 and 2007. For any options granted in the future, compensation expense will be based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R).

The Company will use the straight-line single option method of expensing stock options to recognize compensation expense in its consolidated statements of income for all share-based awards. Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, share-based compensation expense will be reduced to account for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Equity Earnings and Minority Interests

Equity earnings represent investments in affiliates in which the Company does not exercise control and has a 20% or more voting interest. Such investments in affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. If the fair value of an investment in an affiliate is below its carrying value and the difference is deemed to be other than temporary, the difference between the fair value and the carrying value is charged to earnings. The Company has an equity interest in four affiliates, and the equity earnings of these interests were recorded in net income. Equity earnings for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 were $0.7 million and $0, respectively.

The Company records minority interest expense which reflects the portion of the earnings of majority-owned operations which are applicable to the minority interest partners. The Company has majority holdings in various companies, and the minority interests of other persons in the respective net income of these companies were recorded as an expense. Minority interest expense for the first six months of 2008 and 2007 was $1.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

NOTE 2 — RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 157 on November 1, 2009 (2010 for the Company). The provisions of SFAS No. 157 should be applied prospectively to the beginning of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 157 is initially applied, except with respect to certain financial instruments as defined by SFAS No. 157. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. Subsequent changes in fair value of these financial assets and liabilities would be recognized in earnings when they occur. SFAS No. 159 further establishes certain additional disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year beginning on November 1, 2008 (2009 for the Company), with earlier adoption permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, and timing of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 160, “Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” These new standards will significantly change the financial accounting and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (or minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 on November 1, 2009 (2010 for the Company). The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS Nos.141 (R) and 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” The objective of SFAS 161 is to enhance the current disclosure framework in Statement 133 and improve the transparency of financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 161 requires entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010 (2011 for the Company). The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 161 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 — SALE OF NON-UNITED STATES ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Pursuant to the terms of a Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “RPA”) dated October 28, 2004 between Greif Coordination Center BVBA (the “Seller”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., and a major international bank (the “Buyer”), the Seller agreed to sell trade receivables meeting certain eligibility requirements that the Seller had purchased from other indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Greif, Inc., including Greif Belgium BVBA, Greif Germany GmbH, Greif Nederland BV, Greif Spain SA and Greif UK Ltd, under discounted receivables purchase agreements and from Greif France SAS under a factoring agreement. The RPA was amended on October 28, 2005 to include receivables originated by Greif Portugal Lda, also an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc. In addition, on October 28, 2005, Greif Italia S.P.A., also an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., entered into the Italian Receivables Purchase Agreement with the Italian branch of the major international bank (the “Italian RPA”) with Greif Italia S.P.A., agreeing to sell trade receivables that meet certain eligibility criteria to the Italian branch of the major international bank. The Italian RPA is similar in structure and terms as the RPA.

On April 30, 2007, the RPA was amended and restated and the Italian RPA was amended by the parties thereto. As a result of the amended and restated RPA and the amended Italian RPA: (i) the maximum amount of aggregate receivables that may be sold under the Company’s non-United States accounts receivable sales program was increased from €90.0 million to €100.0 million; (ii) Greif Packaging Belgium NV and Greif Packaging Spain S.A., both indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Greif, Inc., have established discounted receivables purchase agreements with the Seller; and (iii) Greif Packaging France SAS, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., has established a factoring agreement with the Seller. On November 15, 2007, the RPA and Italian RPA was amended to increase the maximum amount of the aggregate receivables that may be sold under the Company’s non-United States accounts receivable from €100.0 million to €115.0 million ($179.8 million at April 30, 2008).

In October 2007, Greif Singapore Pte. Ltd., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif Inc., entered into the Singapore Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “Singapore RPA”) with a major international bank. The maximum amount of the aggregate receivables that originally was to be sold under the Singapore RPA was 10.0 million Singapore Dollars. On January 23, 2008, the Singapore RPA was amended to increase the maximum amount of the aggregate receivables that may be sold from 10.0 million Singapore Dollars to 15.0 million Singapore Dollars ($11.0 million at April 30, 2008).

The structure of the transaction provides for a legal true sale, on a revolving basis, of the receivables transferred from the various Greif, Inc. subsidiaries to the respective major international bank. The bank funds an initial purchase price of a certain percentage of eligible receivables based on a formula with the initial purchase price approximating 75 percent to 90 percent of eligible receivables. The remaining deferred purchase price is settled upon collection of the receivables. At the balance sheet reporting dates, the Company removes from accounts receivable the amount of proceeds received from the initial purchase price since they meet the applicable criteria of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” and continues to recognize the deferred purchase price in its accounts receivable. The receivables are sold on a non-recourse basis with the total funds in the servicing collection accounts pledged to the banks between settlement dates. At April 30, 2008, and 2007, €93.0 million ($145.4 million) and €89.7 million ($122.0 million), respectively, of accounts receivable were sold under the RPA and Italian RPA. At April 30, 2008, 8.1 million Singapore Dollars ($6.0 million) of accounts receivable were sold under the Singapore RPA.

At the time the receivables are initially sold, the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets sold are included as a loss on sale in the consolidated statements of income. Expenses, primarily related to the loss on sale of receivables, associated with the RPA and Italian RPA totaled €1.0 million ($1.6 million) and €0.6 million ($0.8 million) for the three months ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Expenses associated with the Singapore RPA were not material to the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2008. Additionally, the Company performs collections and administrative functions on the receivables sold similar to the procedures it uses for collecting all of its receivables, including receivables that are not sold under the RPA, Italian RPA and Singapore RPA. The servicing liability for these receivables is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 4 — INVENTORIES

Inventories are summarized as follows (Dollars in thousands):


	April 30, 2008			October 31, 2007
Finished goods	$	79,819		$	75,428
Raw materials and work-in-process		244,989			202,392

		324,808			277,820
Reduction to state inventories on last-in, first-out basis		(36,808	)		(34,826	)

	$	288,000		$	242,994

NOTE 5 — NET ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Net assets held for sale represent land, buildings and land improvements less accumulated depreciation for locations that meet the classification requirements of net assets held for sale as defined in SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” As of April 30, 2008, there were ten facilities held for sale. The net assets held for sale are being marketed for sale and it is the Company’s intention to complete the facility sales within the upcoming year.

NOTE 6 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company annually reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment as required by SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The Company has concluded that no impairment exists at this time.

Changes to the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the six-month period ended April 30, 2008 are as follows (Dollars in thousands):


	Industrial Packaging			Paper Packaging		Total
Balance at October 31, 2007	$	468,132		$	25,120	$	493,252
Goodwill acquired		31,607			—		31,607
Goodwill disposals		(6,889	)		—		(6,889	)
Goodwill adjustments		9,917			—		9,917
Currency translation		11,559			—		11,559

Balance at April 30, 2008	$	514,326		$	25,120	$	539,446

The goodwill acquired of $31.6 million is preliminary and primarily relates to acquisition of industrial packaging companies in North and South America and the Middle East. The goodwill disposals of $6.9 million represents the divestiture of the Australian drum operations, and the goodwill adjustments represent a net increase in goodwill of $9.9 million primarily related to purchase price adjustments on 2007 acquisitions.

All other intangible assets for the periods presented, except for $8.6 million, related to the Tri-Sure Trademark, Blagden Express Tradename, and Closed-loop Tradename, are subject to amortization and are being amortized using the straight-line method over periods that range from five to 20 years. The detail of other intangible assets by class as of April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007 are as follows (Dollars in thousands):


	Gross Intangible Assets		Accumulated Amortization		Net Intangible Assets
April 30, 2008:
Trademark and patents	$	31,415	$	11,865	$	19,550
Non-compete agreements		19,864		3,717		16,147
Customer relationships		71,446		8,547		62,899
Other		9,831		4,156		5,675

Total	$	132,556	$	28,285	$	104,271


October 31, 2007:
Trademark and patents	$	31,983	$	10,922	$	21,061
Non-compete agreements		19,708		5,328		14,380
Customer relationships		61,145		6,470		54,675
Other		10,032		3,892		6,140

Total	$	122,868	$	26,612	$	96,256

During the first six months of 2008, gross intangible assets increased by $9.7 million. The increase in gross intangible assets is based on preliminary purchase price allocations related to the acquisition of industrial packaging companies in Europe, Asia and North America. Amortization expense for the six months ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 was $4.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be $11.1 million in 2009, $10.9 million in 2010, $9.7 million in 2011, $5.4 million in 2012 and $5.2 million in 2013.

NOTE 7 — RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

The focus for restructuring activities in 2008 is on integration of recent acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging (formerly known as “Industrial Packaging & Services”) segment and on alignment to market focused strategy and implementation of the Greif Business System in the Paper Packaging (formerly known as “Paper, Packaging & Services”) segment. During the first six months of 2008, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $17.8 million, consisting of $5.0 million in employee separation costs, $10.2 million in asset impairments, $0.4 million in professional fees and $2.2 million in other costs. Two company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment were closed. The remaining restructuring charges for the above activities are anticipated to be $12.8 million for the remainder of 2008.

In 2007, the focus for restructuring activities was on integration of acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and on alignment to market-focused strategy in the Paper Packaging segment. During the first six months of 2007, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $6.1 million, consisting of $1.3 million in employee separation costs, $0.9 million in asset impairments, $1.0 million in professional fees and $2.9 million in other costs.

For each relevant business segment, costs incurred in 2008 are as follows (Dollars in thousands):


	Three months ended April 30, 2008		Six months ended April 30, 2008		Total Amounts Expected to be Incurred
Industrial Packaging
Employee separation costs	$	1,100	$	4,936	$	11,665
Asset impairments		3,784		10,236		10,508
Professional fees		186		446		500
Other restructuring costs		1,384		639		5,060

		6,454		16,257		27,733

Paper Packaging
Employee separation costs		—		—		732
Asset impairments		—		—		508
Professional fees		—		—		28
Other restructuring costs		816		1,488		1,532

		816		1,488		2,800

Timber:
Employee separation costs		67		67		67

		67		67		67

	$	7,337	$	17,812	$	30,600

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending restructuring reserve balances for the six-month period ended April 30, 2008 (Dollars in thousands):


	Cash Charges						Non-cash Charges
	Employee Separation Costs			Other Costs			Asset Impairments			Total
Balance at October 31, 2007	$	12,296		$	3,480		$	—		$	15,776
Costs incurred and charged to expense		5,003			2,573			10,236			17,812
Reserves established in the purchase price of business combinations		1,093			—			—			1,093
Costs paid or otherwise settled		(9,285	)		(4,453	)		(10,236	)		(23,974	)

Balance at April 30, 2008	$	9,107		$	1,600		$	—		$	10,707

NOTE 8 — SIGNIFICANT NONSTRATEGIC TIMBERLAND TRANSACTIONS AND CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

On March 28, 2005, Soterra LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary) entered into two real estate purchase and sale agreements with Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. (“Plum Creek”) to sell approximately 56,000 acres of timberland and related assets located primarily in Florida for an aggregate sales price of approximately $90 million, subject to closing adjustments. In connection with the closing of one of these agreements, Soterra LLC sold approximately 35,000 acres of timberland and associated assets in Florida, Georgia and Alabama for $51.0 million, resulting in a pretax gain of $42.1 million, on May 23, 2005. The purchase price was paid in the form of cash and a $50.9 million purchase note payable by an indirect subsidiary of Plum Creek (the “Purchase Note”). Soterra LLC contributed the Purchase Note to STA Timber LLC (“STA Timber”), one of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. The Purchase Note is secured by a Deed of Guarantee issued by Bank of America, N.A., London Branch, in an amount not to exceed $52.3 million (the “Deed of Guarantee”), as a guarantee of the due and punctual payment of principal and interest on the Purchase Note. The Company completed the second phase of its previously reported $90 million sale of timberland, timber and associated assets in the first quarter of 2006. In this phase, the Company sold 15,300 acres of timberland holdings in Florida for $29.3 million in cash,

resulting in a pre-tax gain of $27.4 million. The final phase of this transaction, approximately 5,700 acres sold for $9.7 million, occurred on April 28, 2006 and the Company recognized additional timberland gains in its consolidated statements of income in the periods that these transactions occurred resulting in a pre-tax gain of $9.0 million.

On May 31, 2005, STA Timber issued in a private placement its 5.20 percent Senior Secured Notes due August 5, 2020 (the “Monetization Notes”) in the principal amount of $43.3 million. In connection with the sale of the Monetization Notes, STA Timber entered into note purchase agreements with the purchasers of the Monetization Notes (the “Note Purchase Agreements”) and related documentation. The Monetization Notes are secured by a pledge of the Purchase Note and the Deed of Guarantee. The Monetization Notes may be accelerated in the event of a default in payment or a breach of the other obligations set forth therein or in the Note Purchase Agreements or related documents, subject in certain cases to any applicable cure periods, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events. The Monetization Notes are subject to a mechanism that may cause them, subject to certain conditions, to be extended to November 5, 2020. The proceeds from the sale of the Monetization Notes were primarily used for the repayment of indebtedness.

The Company has consolidated the assets and liabilities of STA Timber in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Because STA Timber is a separate and distinct legal entity from Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries, the assets of STA Timber are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of these entities and the liabilities of STA Timber are not liabilities or obligations of these entities. In addition, Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries have not extended any form of guaranty of the principal or interest on the Monetization Notes. Accordingly, Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries will not become directly or contingently liable for the payment of the Monetization Notes at any time.

The Company has also consolidated the assets and liabilities of the buyer-sponsored special purpose entity (the “Buyer SPE”) involved in these transactions as the result of Interpretation 46R. However, because the Buyer SPE is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Company, the assets of the Buyer SPE are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of the Company and the liabilities of the Buyer SPE are not liabilities or obligations of the Company.

Assets of the Buyer SPE at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007 consist of restricted bank financial instruments of $50.9 million. STA Timber had long-term debt of $43.3 million as of April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007. STA Timber is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the issuer of the Deed of Guarantee, but the Company does not expect that issuer to fail to meet its obligations. The accompanying consolidated income statements for the six month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 includes interest expense on STA Timber debt of $1.1 million and interest income on Buyer SPE investments of $1.2 million.

NOTE 9 — DEBT

Long-term debt is summarized as follows (Dollars in thousands):


	April 30, 2008		October 31, 2007
Credit agreements	$	314,659	$	173,131
Senior notes		300,000		300,000
Trade accounts receivable credit facility		102,605		116,024
Other long-term debt		5,228		33,530

	$	722,492	$	622,685

Credit Agreement

The Company and certain of its international subsidiaries, as borrowers, have entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for a $450.0 million revolving multicurrency credit facility due in 2010. The revolving multicurrency credit facility is available for ongoing working capital and general corporate purposes. Interest is based on a euro currency rate or an alternative base rate that resets periodically plus a calculated margin amount. As of April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, $314.7 million and $173.1 million were outstanding under the Credit Agreement, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the Credit Agreement was 5.20 percent for the six months ended April 30, 2008, and the interest rate was 3.59 percent at April 30, 2008 and 5.50 percent at October 31, 2007.

The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain leverage ratio and a minimum coverage of interest expense. At April 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Senior Notes

On February 9, 2007, the Company issued $300.0 million of 6³ /4 percent Senior Notes due February 1, 2017. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually. Proceeds from the issuance of Senior Notes were principally used to fund the purchase of previously outstanding 8⁷/8 percent Senior Subordinated Notes in a tender offer and for general corporate purposes.

The fair value of the Senior Notes was $297.8 million at April 30, 2008 based on quoted market prices. The Indenture pursuant to which the Senior Notes were issued contains certain covenants. At April 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

United States Trade Accounts Receivable Credit Facility

On October 31, 2003, the Company entered into a five-year, up to $120.0 million, credit facility with an affiliate of a bank in connection with the securitization of certain of the Company’s trade accounts receivable in the United States. On October 24, 2007, the trade accounts receivable credit facility was amended to extend the maturity date to October 20, 2010. The credit facility is secured by certain of the Company’s trade accounts receivable in the United States and bears interest at a variable rate based on the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin or other agreed upon rate (3.57 percent interest rate at April 30, 2008 and 5.38 percent at October 31, 2007). The Company can terminate this facility at any time upon 60 days prior written notice. In connection with this transaction, the Company established Greif Receivables Funding LLC (“GRF”), which is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, because GRF is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Company, the assets of GRF are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of the Company and the liabilities of GRF are not the liabilities or obligations of the Company. This entity purchases and services the Company’s trade accounts receivable that are subject to this credit facility. There was a total of $102.6 million and $116.0 million outstanding under the United States trade accounts receivable credit facility at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, respectively.

The United States trade accounts receivable credit facility provides that in the event the Company breaches any of its financial covenants under the Credit Agreement, and the majority of the lenders thereunder consent to a waiver thereof, but the provider of the trade accounts receivable credit facility does not consent to any such waiver, then the Company must within 90 days of providing notice of the breach, pay all amounts outstanding under the trade accounts receivable credit facility.

Other

In addition to the amounts borrowed against the Credit Agreement and proceeds from the Senior Notes and the United States trade accounts receivable credit facility, the Company had outstanding debt of $53.0 million, comprised of $5.3 million in long-term debt and $47.7 million in short-term borrowings, at April 30, 2008 and outstanding debt of $49.3 million, comprised of $33.5 million in long-term debt and $15.8 million in short-term borrowings, at October 31, 2007.

Annual maturities of the Company’s long-term debt are $5.1 million in 2009, $417.3 million in 2010 and $300.1 million after 2013.

At April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, the Company had deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of $5.5 million and $6.2 million, respectively, which are included in other long-term assets.

NOTE 10 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, current liabilities and short-term borrowings at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007 approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these items.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was $720.2 million and $620.4 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $722.5 million and $622.7 million at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, respectively. The fair values of the Company’s long-term obligations are estimated based on either the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current interest rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities.

The Company uses derivatives from time to time to partially mitigate the effect of exposure to interest rate movements, exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, and commodity cost fluctuations. The Company records derivatives based on SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and related amendments. This Statement requires that all derivatives be recognized as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized in either net income or in other comprehensive income, depending on the designated purpose of the derivative.

The Company had interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $180.0 million and $230.0 million at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, respectively, with various maturities through 2010. The interest rate swap agreements are used to fix a portion of the interest on the Company’s variable rate debt. Under certain of these agreements, the Company receives interest monthly or quarterly from the counterparties equal to LIBOR and pays interest at a fixed rate (5.05 percent at April 30, 2008) over the life of the contracts.

On August 1, 2007, the Company entered into new cross-currency interest rate swaps which are designated as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Under these new agreements, the Company receives interest semi-annually from the counterparties equal to a fixed rate of 6.75 percent on $300.0 million and pays interest at a fixed rate of 6.25 percent on €219.9 million. Upon maturity of these swaps on August 1, 2009, August 1, 2010, and August 1, 2012, the Company will be required to pay €73.3 million to the counterparties and receive $100.0 million from the counterparties on each of these dates. The other Comprehensive loss on these agreements of $35.8 million, representing their fair values, was recorded in other long-term liabilities at April 30, 2008.

At April 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts in the notional amount of $84.1 million ($82.5 million at October 31, 2007). The purpose of these contracts is to hedge the Company’s exposure to foreign currency transactions and short-term intercompany loan balances in its international businesses. The fair value of these contracts at April 30, 2008 resulted in a gain of $0.9 million recorded in other comprehensive income and a loss of $0.1 million recorded in the consolidated statements of income for 2008. The fair value of similar contracts at October 31, 2007 resulted in a gain of $1.1 million recorded in other comprehensive income and a loss of $0.4 million recorded in the consolidated statements of income for 2007.

The Company has entered into certain cash flow hedges to mitigate its exposure to cost fluctuations in natural gas prices through October 31, 2008. The fair value of the energy hedges was in a favorable position of $0.8 million ($0.5 million net of tax) at April 30, 2008, compared to an unfavorable position of $0.3 million ($0.2 million net of tax) at October 31, 2007. As a result of the high correlation between the hedged instruments and the underlying transactions, ineffectiveness has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the quarter ended April 30, 2008.

While the Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its derivative financial instrument contracts, its counterparties are established banks and financial institutions with high credit ratings. The Company has no reason to believe that such counterparties will not be able to fully satisfy their obligations under these contracts.

The fair values of all derivative financial instruments are estimated based on current settlement prices of comparable contracts obtained from dealer quotes or published market prices. The values represent the estimated amounts the Company would pay or receive to terminate the agreements at the reporting date.

During the next six months, the Company expects to reclassify into earnings a net gain from accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $0.5 million after tax at the time the underlying hedge transactions are realized.

NOTE 11 — CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against the Company, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability and safety and health matters. While the amounts claimed in these matters may be substantial, the ultimate liability to the Company may not be currently determinable because of considerable uncertainties that exist. Therefore, it is possible that result of operations or liquidity in a particularly period could be materially affected by certain contingencies.

All lawsuits, claims and proceedings are considered by the Company in establishing reserves for contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 5, the Company accrues for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimated. Based on currently available information known to the Company, the Company believes that its reserves for these litigation-related liabilities are reasonable and that the ultimate outcome of any pending matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results from operations.

NOTE 12 — CAPITAL STOCK

Class A Common Stock is entitled to cumulative dividends of 1 cent a share per year after which Class B Common Stock is entitled to non-cumulative dividends up to one half cent per share per year. Further distribution in any year must be made in proportion of one cent a share for Class A Common Stock to one and a half cents a share for Class B Common Stock. The Class A Common Stock has no voting rights unless four quarterly cumulative dividends upon the Class A Common Stock are in arrears or unless changes are proposed to the Company’s certificate of incorporation. The Class B Common Stock has full voting rights. There is no cumulative voting for the election of directors.

The following table summarizes the Company’s Class A and Class B common and treasury shares at the specified dates:


	Authorized Shares	Issued Shares	Outstanding Shares	Treasury Shares
April 30, 2008:
Class A Common Stock	128,000,000	42,281,920	23,957,800	18,324,120
Class B Common Stock	69,120,000	34,560,000	22,764,766	11,795,234

October 31, 2007:
Class A Common Stock	128,000,000	42,281,920	23,754,753	18,527,167
Class B Common Stock	69,120,000	34,560,000	22,943,666	11,616,334

All share information in the above table has been adjusted to reflect the following: On February 26, 2007, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation increasing the number of the Company’s authorized shares to 128,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 69,120,000 shares of Class B Common Stock. Subsequent to the aforementioned approval, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a 2-for-1 stock split of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. The split was payable on April 11, 2007 to shareholders of record on March 19, 2007. The stock split means that each holder of Class A Common Stock as of the close of business on March 19, 2007 received on April 11, 2007 one additional share of Class A Common Stock for every share they held of Class A Common Stock and each holder of Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on March 19, 2007 received on April 11, 2007 one additional share of Class B Common Stock for every share they held of Class B Common Stock. The day on which such shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange reflecting the stock split was April 12, 2007.

All share information, including the number of shares and per share amounts, included in the Consolidated Financial Statements has been adjusted to reflect the aforementioned 2-for 1 stock split.

NOTE 13 — STOCK OPTIONS

In 2001, the Company adopted the 2001 Management Equity Incentive and Compensation Plan (the “2001 Plan”). The provisions of the 2001 Plan allow the awarding of incentive and nonqualified stock options and restricted and performance shares of Class A Common Stock to key employees. The maximum number of shares that may be issued each year is determined by a formula that takes into consideration the total number of shares outstanding and is also subject to certain limits. In addition, the maximum number of incentive stock options that will be issued under the 2001 Plan during its term is 5,000,000 shares.

Prior to 2001, the Company had adopted a Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”) that provides the discretionary granting of nonstatutory options to key employees, and an Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”) that provides the discretionary granting of incentive stock options to key employees and nonstatutory options for non-employees. The aggregate number of the Company’s Class A Common Stock options that may be granted under the 2000 Plan and Option Plan may not exceed 400,000 shares and 2,000,000 shares, respectively.

Under the terms of the 2001 Plan, the 2000 Plan and the Option Plan, stock options are granted at exercise prices equal to the market value of the common stock on the date options are granted and become fully vested two years after date of grant. Options expire 10 years after date of grant.

In 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan (the “2005 Directors Plan”), which provides the granting of stock options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to directors who are not employees of the Company. Prior to 2005, the Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Plan”) provided the granting of stock options to directors who are not employees of the Company. The aggregate number of the Company’s Class A Common Stock options that may be granted may not exceed 200,000 shares under each of these plans. Under the terms of both plans, options are granted at exercise prices equal to the market value of the common stock on the date options are granted and become exercisable immediately. Options expire 10 years after date of grant.

No stock options were granted during 2008 or during the first six months of 2007.

Stock option activity was as follows (Shares in thousands):


	Six months ended April 30, 2008			Year ended October 31, 2007
	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Beginning balance	1,072	$	15.75	1,633	$	15.62
Granted	—			—		—
Forfeited	—			2		12.71
Exercised	161	$	15.39	559	$	15.38

Ending balance	911	$	15.81	1,072	$	15.75

As of April 30, 2008, outstanding stock options had exercise prices and contractual lives as follows (shares in thousands):


Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life
$5 - $15	529	4 years
$15 - $25	362	6 years
$25 - $35	20	8 years

All outstanding options were exercisable at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007.

All references to the number of shares and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements are presented on a post-split basis.

NOTE 14 — DIVIDENDS PER SHARE

The following dividends per share were paid during the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended April 30				Six Months Ended April 30
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Class A Common Stock	$	0.28	$	0.18	$	0.56	$	0.36
Class B Common Stock	$	0.42	$	0.27	$	0.83	$	0.54

NOTE 15 — CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company has two classes of common stock and, as such, applies the “two-class method” of computing earnings per share as prescribed in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” In accordance with the Statement, earnings are allocated first to Class A and Class B Common Stock to the extent that dividends are actually paid and the remainder allocated assuming all of the earnings for the period have been distributed in the form of dividends.

The following is a reconciliation of the average shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share:


	Three months ended April 30		Six months ended April 30
	2008	2007	2008	2007
Class A Common Stock:
Basic shares	23,911,860	23,638,578	23,850,542	23,532,346
Assumed conversion of stock options	535,589	666,170	525,698	675,821

Diluted shares	24,447,449	24,304,748	24,376,240	24,208,167


Class B Common Stock:
Basic and diluted shares	22,882,611	23,016,580	22,912,762	23,023,066

There were no stock options that were antidilutive for the three months and six months ended April 30, 2008 and 2007.

NOTE 16 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other charges and credits to equity that are not the result of transactions with the Company’s owners. The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows (Dollars in thousands):


	Three months ended April 30					Six months ended April 30
	2008			2007		2008			2007
Net income	$	48,654		$	18,624	$	109,341		$	52,603
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(8,573	)		16,400		(43,576	)		4,447
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives, net of tax		677			1,049		(1,785	)		1,484
Changes in fair value of energy and other derivatives, net of tax		342			681		302			1,020
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax		(728	)		—		35			—

Comprehensive income	$	40,372		$	36,754	$	64,317		$	59,554

NOTE 17 — INCOME TAXES

On November 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 is an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance regarding uncertain tax positions relating to de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The recognition and measurement guidelines of FIN 48 were applied to all of our material income tax positions as of the beginning of fiscal year 2008, resulting in an increase in our tax liabilities of $7.0 million with a corresponding decrease to beginning retained earnings for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle. The total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits at adoption was $150.5 million, of this amount $139.2 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate. At April 30, 2008, the total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits was $156.8 million, of this amount $146.6 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate. This change is primarily due to foreign exchange rate changes. The Company has the ability to offset substantially all of the total unrecognized income tax benefits through purchase accounting items, net operating loss utilization, and deferred tax benefits for temporary differences between book and tax return items.

Interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions are reflected in the Company’s income tax expense. At adoption, interest and penalties of $13.2 million have been accrued.

The Company has estimated the reasonably possible expected net change in unrecognized tax benefits through April 30, 2009 based on 1) anticipated positions taken in the next 12 months, 2) expected settlements or payments of uncertain tax positions, and 3) lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations of unrecognized tax benefits. The estimated net decrease in unrecognized tax benefits for the next 12 months is approximately $3.9 million. Actual results may differ materially from this estimate.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. We have concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters and substantially all material state and foreign income tax matters through fiscal year 2003, with the exception of Brazil and The Netherlands. The Company is undergoing tax audits that have not concluded in these two jurisdictions.

Other than the foreign exchange rate changes, there have been no significant changes in these amounts for the quarter ended April 30, 2008.

NOTE 18 — RETIREMENT PLANS AND POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE AND LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS

The components of net periodic pension cost include the following (Dollars in thousands):


	Three months ended April 30						Six months ended April 30
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service Cost	$	3,151		$	3,419		$	6,302		$	6,838
Interest Cost		7,660			6,827		$	15,320			13,654
Expected return on plan assets		(9,098	)		(7,767	)	$	(18,196	)		(15,534	)
Amortization or prior service cost, initial net asset and net actuarial gain		1,192			1,309		$	2,384			2,618

Net periodic pension costs	$	2,905		$	3,788		$	5,810		$	7,576

The Company made a $7.7 million pension contribution in the six months ended April 30, 2008. Based on minimum funding requirements, $12.4 million of pension contributions are estimated for the entire 2008 fiscal year.

The components of net periodic cost for postretirement benefits include the following (Dollars in thousands):


	Three months ended April 30						Six months ended April 30
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost	$	8		$	11		$	16		$	22
Interest cost		502			527			1,004			1,054
Amortization of prior service cost and recognized actuarial gain		(348	)		(269	)		(696	)		(538	)

Net periodic cost for postretirement benefits	$	162		$	269		$	324		$	538

NOTE 19 — BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in three business segments: Industrial Packaging; Paper Packaging; and Timber.

Operations in the Industrial Packaging segment offer a comprehensive line of products and services, including steel, fibre and plastic drums, intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products, polycarbonate water bottles, blending and packaging services, logistics and warehousing. These products are manufactured and sold in over 45 countries throughout the world.

Operations in the Paper Packaging segment involve the production and sale of containerboard, both semi-chemical and recycled, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers, and multiwall bags and related services. These products are manufactured and sold in North America.

Operations in the Timber segment involve the management and sale of timber and special use properties from approximately 269,950 acres of timber properties in the southeastern United States. The Company also owns approximately 27,450 acres of timber properties in Canada, which are not actively managed at this time. In addition, the Company sells, from time to time, timberland and special use land, which consists of surplus land, higher and better use (“HBU”) land, and development land.

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are substantially the same as those described in the “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” note (see Note 1) in the 2007 Form 10-K.

The following segment information is presented for the periods indicated (Dollars in thousands):


	Three months ended April 30,					Six months ended April 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
Net sales:
Industrial Packaging	$	748,009	$	657,974		$	1,419,287	$	1,250,258
Paper Packaging		163,442		153,033			332,246		307,279
Timber		6,568		4,036			12,778		8,265

Total net sales	$	918,019	$	815,043		$	1,764,311	$	1,565,802


Operating profit:
Operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net
Industrial Packaging	$	64,209	$	55,437		$	142,281	$	92,318
Paper Packaging		14,053		9,502			34,452		26,745
Timber		10,446		3,370			16,561		9,862

Operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net		88,708		68,309			193,294		128,925

Restructuring charges:
Industrial Packaging		6,454		1,670			16,257		2,918
Paper Packaging		816		2,379			1,488		3,168
Timber		67		—			67		—

Total restructuring charges		7,337		4,049			17,812		6,086


Timberland disposals, net—Timber		100		(382	)		190		(320	)

Total Operating profit	$	81,471	$	63,878		$	175,672	$	122,519


Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense:
Industrial Packaging	$	18,312	$	18,713		$	36,060	$	36,475
Paper Packaging		7,283		7,060			13,102		14,178
Timber		1,180		1,331			3,476		2,623
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	$	26,775	$	27,104		$	52,638	$	53,276


						April 30, 2008		October 31, 2007
Assets:
Industrial Packaging						$	1,854,083	$	1,935,452
Paper Packaging							407,808		208,713
Timber							255,148		252,540

Total segments							2,517,039		2,396,705
Corporate and other							273,846		256,006

Total assets						$	2,790,885	$	2,652,711

The following table presents net sales to external customers by geographic area (Dollars in thousands):


	Three months ended April 30,				Six months ended April 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Net sales:
North America	$	475,780	$	442,671	$	925,850	$	872,559
Europe		310,674		261,528		577,930		473,560
Other		131,565		110,844		260,531		219,683

Total net sales	$	918,019	$	815,043	$	1,764,311	$	1,565,802

The following table presents total assets by geographic area (Dollars in thousands):


	April 30, 2008		October 31, 2007
Assets:
North America	$	1,720,361	$	1,587,022
Europe		710,629		734,649
Other		359,895		331,040

	$	2,790,885	$	2,652,711

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The terms “Greif,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our” as used in this discussion refer to Greif, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Our fiscal year begins on November 1 and ends on October 31 of the following year. Any references in this Form 10-Q to the years 2008 or 2007, or to any quarter of those years, relates to the fiscal year or quarter, as the case may be, ending in that year.

The discussion and analysis presented below relates to the material changes in financial condition and results of operations for our consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, and for the consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 (the “2007 Form 10-K”). Readers are encouraged to review the entire 2007 Form 10-K, as it includes information regarding Greif not discussed in this Form 10-Q. This information will assist in your understanding of the discussion of our current period financial results.

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-Q, including without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, goals and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “believe,” “continue” or “target” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. All forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q are based on information currently available to our management. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements have a reasonable basis, we can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the statements. For a discussion of the most significant risks and uncertainties that could cause Greif’s actual results to differ materially from those projected, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the 2007 Form 10-K, updated by Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to such risk factors. Except to the limited extent required by applicable law, Greif undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

OVERVIEW

We operate in three business segments: Industrial Packaging (formerly known as “Industrial Packaging & Services”); Paper Packaging (formerly known as “Paper, Packaging & Services”); and Timber.

We are a leading global provider of industrial packaging products such as steel, fibre and plastic drums, intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products, and polycarbonate water bottles, which are complemented with a variety of value-added services, including blending, packaging, logistics and warehousing. We seek to provide complete packaging solutions to our customers by offering a comprehensive range of products and services on a global basis. We sell our products to customers in industries such as chemicals, paint and pigments, food and beverage, petroleum, industrial coatings, agricultural, pharmaceutical and mineral, among others. In addition, we provide a variety of blending and packaging services, logistics and warehousing to customers in many of these same industries in North America.

We sell our containerboard, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers and multiwall bags to customers in North America in industries such as packaging, automotive, food and building products. Our corrugated container products are used to ship such diverse products as home appliances, small machinery, grocery products, building products, automotive components, books and furniture, as well as numerous other applications. Our full line of multiwall bag products is used to ship a wide range of industrial and consumer products, such as seed, fertilizers, chemicals, concrete, flour, sugar, feed, pet foods, popcorn, charcoal and salt, primarily for the agricultural, chemical, building products and food industries

As of April 30, 2008, we owned approximately 269,950 acres of timberland in the southeastern United States, which is actively managed, and approximately 27,450 acres of timberland in Canada. Our timber management is focused on the active harvesting and regeneration of our timber properties to achieve sustainable long-term yields on our timberland. While timber sales are subject to fluctuations, we seek to maintain a consistent cutting schedule, within the limits of available merchantable acreage of timber, market and weather conditions. We also sell, from time to time, timberland and special use land, which consists of surplus land, higher and better use (“HBU”) land, and development land.

In 2003, we began a transformation to become a leaner, more market-focused/performance-driven company – what we call the “Greif Business System.” We believe the Greif Business System has and will continue to generate productivity improvements and achieve permanent cost reductions. The Greif Business System continues to focus on opportunities such as improved labor productivity, material yield and other manufacturing efficiencies, along with further plant consolidations. In addition, as part of the Greif Business System, we have launched a strategic sourcing initiative to more effectively leverage our global spending and lay the foundation for a world-class sourcing and supply chain capability.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements, in accordance with these principles, require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements.

A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2007 Form 10-K. We believe that the consistent application of these policies enables us to provide readers of the consolidated financial statements with useful and reliable information about our results of operations and financial condition. The following are the accounting policies that we believe are most important to the portrayal of our results of operations and financial condition and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Allowance for Accounts Receivable. We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, we record a specific allowance for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. In addition, we recognize allowances for bad debts based on the length of time receivables are past due with allowance percentages, based on our historical experiences, applied on a graduated scale relative to the age of the receivable amounts. If circumstances change (e.g., higher than expected bad debt experience or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us), our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could change by a material amount.

Inventory Reserves. Reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on historical experience and product demand. We continuously evaluate the adequacy of these reserves and make adjustments to these reserves as required.

Net Assets Held for Sale. Net assets held for sale represent land, buildings and land improvements less accumulated depreciation for locations that have been closed. We record net assets held for sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” at the lower of carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value is based on the estimated proceeds from the sale of the facility utilizing recent purchase offers, market comparables and/or data obtained from our commercial real estate broker. Our estimate as to fair value is regularly reviewed and subject to changes in the commercial real estate markets and our continuing evaluation as to the facility’s acceptable sale price.

Properties, Plants and Equipment. Depreciation on properties, plants and equipment is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our assets.

We own timber properties in the southeastern United States and in Canada. With respect to our United States timber properties, which consisted of approximately 269,950 acres at April 30, 2008, depletion expense is computed on the basis of cost and the estimated recoverable timber acquired. Our land costs are maintained by tract. Merchantable timber costs are maintained by five product classes, pine sawtimber, pine chip-n-saw, pine pulpwood, hardwood sawtimber and hardwood pulpwood, within a “depletion block,” with each depletion block based upon a geographic district or subdistrict. Currently, we have 11 depletion blocks. These same depletion blocks are used for pre-merchantable timber costs. Each year, we estimate the volume of our merchantable timber for the five product classes by each depletion block. These estimates are based on the current state in the growth cycle and not on quantities to be available in future years. Our estimates do not include costs to be incurred in the future. We then project these volumes to the end of the year. Upon acquisition of a new timberland tract, we record separate amounts for land, merchantable timber and pre-merchantable timber allocated as a percentage of the values being purchased. These acquisition volumes and costs acquired during the year are added to the totals for each product class within the appropriate depletion block(s). The total of the beginning, one-year growth and acquisition volumes are divided by the total undepleted historical cost to arrive at a depletion rate, which is then used for the current year. As timber is sold, we multiply the volumes sold by the depletion rate for the current year to arrive at the depletion cost. Our Canadian timberland, which consisted of approximately 27,450 acres at April 30, 2008, did not have any depletion expense since it is not actively managed at this time.

We believe that the lives and methods of determining depreciation and depletion are reasonable; however, using other lives and methods could provide materially different results.

Restructuring Reserves. Restructuring reserves are determined in accordance with appropriate accounting guidance, including SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges,” depending upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the situation. Restructuring reserves are further discussed in Note 7 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits. Our actuaries using assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of compensation increase and health care cost trend rates determine pension and postretirement benefit expenses. Further discussion of our pension and postretirement benefit plans and related assumptions is contained in Note 17 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement included in this Form 10-Q. The results would be different using other assumptions.

Income Taxes. We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of our reported results of operations. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized. On November 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” Further information may be found in Note 16, to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q.

We believe it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets. In the event that all or part of the net deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged either to earnings or to goodwill, whichever is appropriate, in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of FIN 48 and other complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on our financial condition and operating results.

Environmental Cleanup Costs. We expense environmental costs related to existing conditions caused by past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernable. Expenditures that extend the life of the related property, or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination, are capitalized.

Environmental expenses were insignificant for the six months ended April 30, 2008 and April 30, 2007. Environmental cash expenditures were $1.1 million and insignificant for the six months ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our reserves for environmental liabilities at April 30, 2008 amounted to $40.9 million, which included a reserve of $21.8 million related to our blending facility in Chicago, Illinois (acquired in September 2006) and $11.3 million related to our Blagden facilities (acquired in November 2006). The remaining reserves were for asserted and unasserted environmental litigation, claims and/or assessments at manufacturing sites and other locations where we believe it is probable the outcome of such matters will be unfavorable to us, but the environmental exposure at any one of those sites was not individually material. Reserves for large environmental exposures are principally based on environmental studies and cost estimates provided by third parties, but also take into account management estimates. Reserves for less significant environmental exposures are principally based on management estimates.

We anticipate that expenditures for remediation costs at most of the sites will be made over an extended period of time. Given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, actual costs may vary from those estimated at April 30, 2008. Our exposure to adverse developments with respect to any individual site is not expected to be material. Although environmental remediation could have a material effect on results of operations if a series of adverse developments occur in a particular quarter or fiscal year, we believe that the chance of a series of adverse developments occurring in the same quarter or fiscal year is remote. Future information and developments will require us to continually reassess the expected impact of these environmental matters.

Self-Insurance. We are self-insured for certain of the claims made under our employee medical and dental insurance programs. We had recorded liabilities totaling $3.4 million and $3.1 million of estimated costs related to outstanding claims at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, respectively. These costs include an estimate for expected settlements on pending claims, administrative fees and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on our assessment of outstanding claims, historical analysis and current payment trends. We record an estimate for the claims incurred but not reported using an estimated lag period based upon historical information. This lag period assumption has been consistently applied for the periods presented. If the lag period were hypothetically adjusted by a period equal to a half month, the impact on earnings would be approximately $0.9 million. However, we believe the liabilities recorded are adequate based upon current facts and circumstances.

We have certain deductibles applied to various insurance policies including general liability, product, auto and workers’ compensation. Deductible liabilities are insured primarily through our captive insurance subsidiary. We recorded liabilities totaling $21.0 million and $22.0 million for anticipated costs related to general liability, product, auto and workers’ compensation at April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007, respectively. These costs include an estimate for expected settlements on pending claims, defense costs and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on our assessment of outstanding claims, historical analysis, actuarial information and current payment trends.

Contingencies. Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against us, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability, and safety and health matters. We are continually consulting legal counsel and evaluating requirements to reserve for contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot currently be determined because of the considerable uncertainties that exist. Based on the facts currently available, we believe the disposition of matters that are pending will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer amortized, but instead are periodically reviewed for impairment as required by SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The costs of acquired intangible assets determined to have definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives of five to 20 years. Our policy is to periodically review other intangible assets subject to amortization and other long-lived assets based upon the evaluation of such factors as the occurrence of a significant adverse event or change in the environment in which the business operates, or if the expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) would become less than the carrying amount of the asset. An impairment loss would be recorded in the period such determination is made based on the fair value of the related assets.

Other Items. Other items that could have a significant impact on the financial statements include the risks and uncertainties listed in Part I, Item 1A—Risk Factors, of the 2007 Form 10-K, as updated by Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. Actual results could differ materially using different estimates and assumptions, or if conditions are significantly different in the future.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following comparative information is presented for the three-month and six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007. Historically, revenues or earnings may or may not be representative of future operating results due to various economic and other factors.

The financial measure of operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net, is used throughout the following discussion of our results of operations (except with respect to the segment discussions for Industrial Packaging and Paper Packaging , where timberland disposals, net are not applicable). Operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net, is equal to operating profit plus restructuring charges less timberland gains plus timberland losses. We use operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net, because we believe that this measure provides a better indication of our operational performance because it excludes restructuring charges, which are not representative of ongoing operations, and timberland disposals, net, which are volatile from period to period, and it provides a more stable platform on which to compare our historical performance.

Second Quarter Results

Overview

Net sales increased 13 percent (7 percent excluding the impact of foreign currency translation) to $918.0 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $815.0 million in the second quarter of 2007. The $103.0 million increase was due to Industrial Packaging ($90.0 million), Paper Packaging ($10.4 million) and Timber ($2.6 million). Higher sales volumes for industrial packaging products and higher selling prices primarily drove the 7 percent constant-currency increase.

Operating profit was $81.5 million and $63.9 million in the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $88.7 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to $68.3 million for the second quarter of 2007. The $20.4 million increase was principally due to higher operating profit in Industrial Packaging ($8.8 million), Paper Packaging ($4.6 million) and Timber ($7.0 million).

The following table sets forth the net sales and operating profit for each of our business segments (Dollars in millions):


For the three months ended April 30,	2008		2007
Net sales:
Industrial Packaging	$	748.0	$	658.0
Paper Packaging		163.4		153.0
Timber		6.6		4.0

Total net sales		918.0		815.0


Operating profit:
Operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net:
Industrial Packaging	$	64.2	$	55.4
Paper Packaging		14.1		9.5
Timber		10.4		3.4

Total operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net		88.7		68.3


Restructuring charges:
Industrial Packaging		6.4		1.6
Paper Packaging		0.8		2.4
Timber		0.1		—

Total restructuring charges	$	7.3	$	4.0


Timberland disposals, net:
Timber		0.1		(0.4	)


Operating profit:
Industrial Packaging		57.8		53.8
Paper Packaging		13.2		7.1
Timber		10.5		3.0

Total operating profit	$	81.5	$	63.9

Segment Review

Industrial Packaging

Our Industrial Packaging segment offers a comprehensive line of industrial packaging products and services, such as steel, fibre and plastic drums, intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products, polycarbonate water bottles, blending, filling and other packaging services, logistics and warehousing. The key factors influencing profitability in the Industrial Packaging segment are:

•

Selling prices and sales volumes;

•

Raw material costs, primarily steel, resin and containerboard;

•

Energy and transportation costs;

•

Benefits from executing the Greif Business System;

•

Contributions from recent acquisitions;

•

Divestiture of business units; and

•

Impact of foreign currency translation.

In this segment, net sales were up 14 percent to $748.0 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $658.0 million in the second quarter of 2007 — an increase of 7 percent excluding the impact of foreign currency translation. Higher sales volumes in most regions, with particular strength in Europe and the emerging markets, continued to drive the segment’s organic growth.

Gross profit margin for the Industrial Packaging segment was 18.1 percent in the second quarter of 2008 versus 18.4 percent in the second quarter of 2007.

Operating profit was $57.8 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $53.8 million in the second quarter of 2007. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges increased to $64.2 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $55.4 million in the first quarter of 2007. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to improvement in net sales volumes and contributions from the execution of the Greif Business System, which were partially offset by higher costs of raw material, especially steel, energy and transportation.

Paper Packaging

Our Paper Packaging segment sells containerboard, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers and multiwall bags in North America. The key factors influencing profitability in the Paper Packaging segment are:

•

Selling prices and sales volumes;

•

Raw material costs, primarily old corrugated containers (“OCC”);

•

Energy and transportation costs; and

•

Benefits from executing the Greif Business System.

In this segment, net sales were $163.4 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $153.0 million in the second quarter of 2007. The increase in net sales was principally due to higher containerboard selling prices implemented in during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.

Gross profit margin for the Paper Packaging segment was 13.2 percent in the second quarter of 2008 versus 12.6 percent in the second quarter of 2007.

Operating Profit was $13.2 million and $7.1 million in the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges increased to $14.1 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2007. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to higher selling prices and contributions from the execution of the Greif Business System, which were partially offset by higher raw material costs, especially OCC, energy and transportation.

Timber

As of April 30, 2008, our Timber segment consists of approximately 269,950 acres of timber properties in the southeastern United States, which are actively harvested and regenerated, and approximately 27,450 acres in Canada. The key factors influencing profitability in the Timber segment are:

•

Planned level of timber sales;

•

Gains (losses) on sale of timberland; and

•

Sale of special use properties (surplus, HBU, and development properties).

Net sales were $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $4.0 million in the second quarter of 2007.

Operating profit was $10.5 million and $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $10.4 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $3.4 million in the second quarter of 2007. Included in these amounts were profits from the sale of special use properties of $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2007.

Other Income Statement Changes

Cost of Products Sold

The cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, was 82.7 percent for the second quarter of 2008 versus 82.5 percent for the second quarter of 2007. Higher raw material costs were the primary reason for the increase in cost of products sold, which was offset by higher selling prices and contributions from further execution of the Greif Business System.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses were $83.4 million, or 9.1 percent of net sales, in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $77.7 million, or 9.5 percent of net sales, in the second quarter of 2007. The dollar increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to recent acquisitions and the impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by tighter controls over SG&A expenses and the impact of acquisition integration activities.

Restructuring Charges

During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded restructuring charges of $7.3 million, consisting of $1.2 million in employee separation costs, $3.8 million in asset impairments and $2.3 million in other costs. The focus of the 2008 restructuring activities is on integration of recent acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and alignment of the market-focused strategy and implementation of the Greif Business System in the Paper Packaging segment.

During the second quarter of 2007, we recorded restructuring charges of $4.0 million, consisting of $0.6 million in employee separation costs, $0.5 million in asset impairments and $2.9 million in other costs. In 2007, our restructuring charges were primarily related to integration of acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and on alignment of the market-focused strategy and implementation of the Greif Business System in the Paper Packaging segment.

Timberland Disposals, Net

During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a net gain on sale of timber property of $0.1 million compared to a net loss of $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2007.

Gain on Disposal of Properties, Plants and Equipment, Net

During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net of $13.0 million, primarily from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties of $8.3 million. During the second quarter of 2007, gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net was $3.4 million, primarily consisting of $1.8 million in gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net was $13.3 million and $10.0 million for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in interest expense, net was primarily attributable to higher average interest rates, especially in the emerging markets.

Debt Extinguishment Charge

During the second quarter of 2007, we issued $300 million of 6³ /4 percent Senior Notes due 2017. At the same time, we completed a tender offer for its 8⁷/8 percent Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012. In the tender offer, we purchased $245.6 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes, which represented 99 percent of the outstanding notes. As a result of this transaction, a debt extinguishment charge was recorded during the second quarter of 2007. This $23.5 million charge included $14.5 million in cash and $9.0 million in non-cash items. Proceeds from the Senior Note issuance were primarily used to fund the purchase of the Senior Subordinated Notes in the tender offer. These actions, excluding the impact of the debt extinguishment charge, are immediately accretive to earnings.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net during second quarter of 2008 was $3.8 million compared to other expense, net of $4.3 million during the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in other expense, net was primarily due to divestiture of the controlling interest of Zimbabwean drum operations which had a hyperinflation adjustment of $1.1 million expense during the second quarter of 2007, partially offset by an increase in fees associated with our non-United States trade receivable facility and foreign exchange losses.

Income Tax Expense

The effective tax rate was 22.9 percent and 28.0 percent in the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The lower effective tax rate resulted from a change in the mix of income to outside the United States in the second quarter 2008 compared to the same period last year.

Equity Earnings and Minority Interests

Equity earnings of affiliates and minority interests was a loss of $1.0 million and a loss of $0.1 million for the three months ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We have minority holdings in various companies, and the minority interests of other persons in the respective net income of these companies have been recorded as an expense. These expenses were partially offset by equity in the earnings of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Net Income

Based on the foregoing, we recorded net income of $48.7 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to $18.6 million in the second quarter of 2007.

Year-to-Date Results

Overview

Net sales increased 13 percent (7 percent excluding the impact of foreign currency translation) to $1,764.3 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $1,565.8 million in the first half of 2007. The $198.5 million increase is due to Industrial Packaging ($169.1 million), Paper Packaging ($24.9 million) and Timber ($4.5 million). Higher sales volumes and selling prices primarily drove the 7 percent constant-currency increase.

Operating profit was $175.7 million and $122.5 million in the first half of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $193.3 million for the first half of 2008 compared to $128.9 million for the first half of 2007. The $64.4 million increase included a $29.9 million pre-tax net gain on the divestiture of business units in Australia and the controlling interest in Zimbabwe. The remaining $34.5 million increase was principally due to higher operating profit in Industrial Packaging ($20.0 million), Paper Packaging ($7.8 million) and Timber ($6.7 million).

The following table sets forth the net sales and operating profit for each of our business segments (Dollars in millions):


For the six months ended April 30,	2008		2007
Net sales:
Industrial Packaging	$	1,419.3	$	1,250.2
Paper Packaging		332.2		307.3
Timber		12.8		8.3

Total net sales		1,764.3		1,565.8


Operating profit:
Operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net:
Industrial Packaging	$	142.2	$	92.3
Paper Packaging		34.5		26.7
Timber		16.6		9.9

Total operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net		193.3		128.9


Restructuring charges:
Industrial Packaging		16.2		2.9
Paper Packaging		1.5		3.2
Timber		0.1		—

Total restructuring charges	$	17.8	$	6.1


Timberland disposals, net:
Timber		0.2		(0.3	)


Operating profit:
Industrial Packaging		126.0		89.4
Paper Packaging		33.0		23.5
Timber		16.7		9.6

Total operating profit	$	175.7	$	122.5

Segment Review

Industrial Packaging

•

Selling prices and sales volumes;

•

Raw material costs, primarily steel, resin and containerboard;

•

Energy and transportation costs;

•

Benefits from executing the Greif Business System;

•

Contributions from recent acquisitions;

•

Divestiture of business units; and

•

Impact of foreign currency translation.

In this segment, net sales were up 14 percent to $1,419.3 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $1,250.2 million in the first half of 2007 — an increase of 7 percent excluding the impact of foreign currency translation. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the higher sales volumes in most of the industrial packaging businesses.

Gross profit margin for the Industrial Packaging segment was 17.5 percent for both the first half of 2008 and 2007.

Operating profit was $126.5 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $89.4 million in the first half of 2007. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges increased to $142.3 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $92.3 million in the first half of 2007. The increase in operating profit included a $29.9 million pre-tax net gain on the divestiture of business units in Australia and the controlling interest in Zimbabwe. The remaining increase in operating profit was primarily due to improvement in net sales volumes and execution of the Greif Business System.

Paper Packaging

•

Selling prices and sales volumes;

•

Raw material costs, primarily old corrugated containers (“OCC”);

•

Energy and transportation costs; and

•

Benefits from executing the Greif Business System.

In this segment, net sales were $332.2 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $307.3 million in the first half of 2007. The increase in net sales was principally due to higher containerboard selling prices implemented in during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.

The Paper Packaging segment’s gross profit margin was 16.5 percent in the first half of 2008 compared to 15.9 percent for the first half of 2007.

Operating Profit was $32.6 million and $23.5 million in the first half of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges increased to $34.5 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $26.7 million in the first half of 2007. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to higher selling prices and contributions from the execution of the Greif Business System, which were partially offset by higher raw material costs, especially OCC, energy and transportation.

Timber

•

Planned level of timber sales;

•

Gains (losses) on sale of timberland; and

•

Sale of special use properties (surplus, HBU, and development properties).

Net sales were $12.8 million in the first half of 2008 and $8.3 million in the first half of 2007.

Operating profit was $16.7 million and $9.6 million in the first half of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $16.6 million in the first half of 2008 compared to $9.9 million in the first half of 2007. Included in these amounts were profits from the sale of special use properties of $13.3 million in the first half of 2008 and $6.7 million in the first half of 2007.

Other Income Statement Changes

Cost of Products Sold

The cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, was 82.6 percent for both the first half of 2008 and 2007. Higher raw material costs were offset by higher selling prices and contributions from further execution of the Greif Business System.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses were $163.9 million, or 9.3 percent of net sales, in the first half of 2008 compared to $152.3 million, or 9.7 percent of net sales, in the first half of 2007. The dollar increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to our recent acquisitions and the impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by tighter controls over SG&A expenses.

Restructuring Charges

During the first half of 2008, we recorded restructuring charges of $17.8 million, consisting of $5.0 million in employee separation costs, $10.2 million in asset impairments and $2.6 million in other costs. The focus of the 2008 restructuring activities is on integration of acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and alignment of the market-focused strategy and implementation of the Greif Business System in the Paper Packaging segment.

During the first half of 2007, we recorded restructuring charges of $6.1 million, consisting of $1.3 million in employee separation costs, $0.9 million in asset impairments and $3.9 million in other costs. In 2007, our restructuring charges were primarily related to integration of acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and on alignment of the market-focused strategy and implementation of Greif Business System in the Paper Packaging segment.

Timberland Disposals, Net

During the first half of 2008, we recorded a net gain on sale of timber property of $0.2 million compared to a net loss of $0.3 million in the first half of 2007.

Gain on Disposal of Properties, Plants and Equipment, Net

During the first half of 2008, we recorded a gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net of $49.7 million, primarily consisting of a $29.9 million pre-tax net gain on divestiture of business units in Australia and the controlling interest in Zimbabwe, and $11.8 million in net gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties. During the first half of 2007, gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net was $8.6 million, primarily consisting of $5.8 million in gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties.

Debt Extinguishment Charge

During the second quarter of 2007, we issued $300 million of 6 3/4 percent Senior Notes due 2017. At the same time, we completed a tender offer for its 8 7/8 percent Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012. In the tender offer, we purchased $245.6 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes, which represented 99 percent of the outstanding notes. As a result of this transaction, a debt extinguishment charge was recorded during the second quarter of 2007. This $23.5 million charge included $14.5 million in cash and $9.0 million in non-cash items. Proceeds from the Senior Note issuance were primarily used to fund the purchase of the Senior Subordinated Notes in the tender offer. These actions, excluding the impact of the debt extinguishment charge, are immediately accretive to earnings.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net was $25.1 million and $22.1 million for the first half of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in interest expense, net was primarily attributable to higher average debt outstanding and interest rates, especially in the emerging markets.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net during first half of 2008 was $7.1 million compared to other expense, net of $5.1 million during the first half of 2007. The increase in other expense, net was primarily due to an increase in fees associated with our non-United States trade receivable facility and other miscellaneous expenses.

Income Tax Expense

The effective tax rate was 23.3 percent and 26.2 percent in the first half of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The lower effective tax rate resulted from a change in the mix of income to outside the United States in the first half 2008 compared to the same period last year.

Equity Earnings and Minority Interests

Equity earnings of affiliates and minority interests was a loss of $0.7 million and a loss of $0.5 million for the first half of 2008 and 2007, respectively. We have minority holdings in various companies, and the minority interests of other persons in the respective net income of these companies have been recorded as an expense. These expenses were partially offset by equity in the earnings of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Net Income

Based on the foregoing, we recorded net income of $109.3 million for the first half of 2008 compared to $52.6 million in the first half of 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity are operating cash flows, the proceeds from our trade accounts receivable credit facility, proceeds from the sale of our non-United States accounts receivable, borrowings under our Credit Agreement and proceeds from the sale of our Senior Notes, further discussed below. We have used these sources to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, cash dividends, common stock repurchases and acquisitions. We anticipate continuing to fund these items in a like manner. We currently expect that operating cash flows, the proceeds from our United States trade accounts receivable credit facility, proceeds from the sale of our non-United States accounts receivable and borrowings under our Credit Agreement will be sufficient to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayment and other liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

Capital Expenditures, Business Acquisitions and Divestitures

During the first half of 2008, we invested $69.5 million in capital expenditures, excluding timberland purchases of $1.3 million, compared with capital expenditures of $74.2 million, excluding timberland purchases of $0.4 million, during the same period last year.

We expect capital expenditures, excluding timberland purchases, to be approximately $125 million in 2008, which includes expansion capital to support our growth strategy in the emerging markets.

During the first quarter of 2008, we acquired three small industrial packaging companies for an aggregate purchase price of $69.4 million. These three acquisitions, one in South America (70 percent interest), one in the Middle East, and one in North America, complimented our current businesses. During the first quarter of 2008, we sold our Australian drum operations and a 51 percent interest in our Zimbabwean drum operations. The proceeds from these divestitures were $28.4 million resulting in a net gain of $29.9 million. The 2007 sales and net income from these operations were not material to our overall operations. No acquisitions or divestitures were completed during the second quarter of 2008.

Balance Sheet Changes

Our trade accounts receivable increased $60.3 million, primarily due to the 2008 first quarter acquisitions in North and South America and the Middle East and higher selling prices.

Inventories increased $45.0 million, primarily due to acceleration of raw material purchases in anticipation of rising steel costs and the 2008 first quarter acquisitions in North and South America and the Middle East and higher raw material costs.

Goodwill and intangible assets increased $54.2 million primarily due to the 2008 first quarter acquisitions in North and South America and the Middle East and final purchase accounting related to our acquisitions completed in 2007.

Long-term notes receivable decreased $33.1 million due to the early payment of a note receivable.

Accounts payable decreased $32.1 million and accrued payroll and employee benefits decreased $11.5 million due to seasonality factors and timing of payments.

Debt increased $131.6 million due to seasonal factors, acceleration of inventory purchases in response to rising raw material costs, and the payment of fiscal 2007 performance-based incentives during 2008, as well as, the 2008 first quarter acquisitions in North and South America and the Middle East.

Other long-term liabilities increased by $109.1 million and deferred tax liabilities decreased by $84.7 million primarily due to the implementation of FIN 48.

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)—Foreign currency translation decreased $46.6 million, primarily due to the recognition of $37.4 million CTA gain on the sale of the Australian drum operations.

Borrowing Arrangements

Credit Agreement

We and certain of our international subsidiaries, as borrowers, and a syndicate of financial institutions are parties to a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) that provides us with a $450.0 million revolving multicurrency credit facility due 2010. The revolving multicurrency credit facility is available to us for ongoing working capital and general corporate purposes. Interest is based on a euro currency rate or an alternative base rate that resets periodically plus a calculated margin amount. There was $314.7 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement at April 30, 2008.

The terms of the Credit Agreement limit our ability to make “restricted payments,” which include dividends and purchases, redemptions and acquisitions of our equity interests. The repayment of this facility is secured by a pledge of the capital stock of substantially all of our United States subsidiaries and, in part, by the capital stock of the international borrowers.

The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, which include financial covenants that require us to maintain a certain leverage ratio and a minimum coverage of interest expense. The leverage ratio generally requires that at the end of any fiscal quarter we will not permit the ratio of (a) our total consolidated indebtedness less cash and cash equivalents to (b) our consolidated net income plus depreciation, depletion and amortization, interest expense (including capitalized interest), income taxes, and minus certain extraordinary gains and non-recurring gains (or plus certain extraordinary losses and non-recurring losses) for the preceding twelve months (“EBITDA”) to be greater than 3.5 to 1. The interest coverage ratio generally requires that at the end of any fiscal quarter we will not permit the ratio of (a) our EBITDA to (b) our interest expense (including capitalized interest) for the preceding twelve months to be less than 3.0 to 1. As of April 30, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants.

Senior Notes

We have issued $300.0 million of our 6³/4 percent Senior Notes due February 1, 2017. Proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes were principally used to fund the purchase of our previously outstanding senior subordinated notes and for general corporate purposes. The Senior Notes are general unsecured obligations of Greif, provide for semi-annual payments of interest at a fixed rate of

6.75 percent, and do not require any principal payments prior to maturity on February 1, 2017. The Senior Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries and thereby are effectively subordinated to all of our subsidiaries’ existing and future indebtedness. The Indenture pursuant to which the Senior Notes were issued contains covenants, which, among other things, limit our ability to create liens on our assets to secure debt and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions. These covenants are subject to a number of limitations and exceptions as set forth in the Indenture. At April 30, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants.

United States Trade Accounts Receivable Credit Facility

We have entered into an up to $120.0 million credit facility which matures in October 2010 with an affiliate of a bank in connection with the securitization of certain of our United States trade accounts receivable. The credit facility is secured by certain of our United States trade accounts receivable and bears interest at a variable rate based on the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin or other agreed upon rate. We can terminate this facility at any time upon 60 days prior written notice. In connection with this transaction, we established Greif Receivables Funding LLC (“GRF”), which is included in our consolidated financial statements. However, because GRF is a separate and distinct legal entity from us, the assets of GRF are not available to satisfy our liabilities and obligations and the liabilities of GRF are not our liabilities or obligations. This entity purchases and services our trade accounts receivable that are subject to this credit facility. There was a total of $102.6 million outstanding under the United States trade accounts receivable credit facility at April 30, 2008.

The trade accounts receivable credit facility provides that in the event we breach any of our financial covenants under the Credit Agreement, and the majority of the lenders there under consent to a waiver thereof, but the provider of the trade accounts receivable credit facility does not consent to any such waiver, then we must within 90 days of providing notice of the breach, pay all amounts outstanding under the trade accounts receivable credit facility.

Sale of Non-United States Accounts Receivable

Pursuant to the terms of a Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “RPA”) between Greif Coordination Center BVBA (the “Seller”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., and a major international bank (the “Buyer”), the Seller has agreed to sell trade receivables to Buyer that meet certain eligibility requirements and that Seller has purchased from other indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Greif, Inc. under discounted receivables purchase agreements and from Greif France SAS under a factoring agreement. In addition, Greif Italia S.p.A., also an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., is a party to an Italian Receivables Purchase Agreement with the Italian branch of the major international bank (the “Italian RPA”) pursuant to which it sells trade receivables that meet certain eligibility criteria to the Italian branch of the major international bank. The Italian RPA is similar in structure and terms as the RPA. The maximum amount of aggregate receivables that may be sold under the RPA and Italian RPA was €115.0 million ($179.8 million) at April 30, 2008.

Greif Singapore Pte. Ltd., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif Inc., has entered into the Singapore Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “Singapore RPA”) with a major international bank. The maximum amount of the aggregate receivables that was to be sold under the Singapore RPA was 10.0 million Singapore Dollars. On January 23, 2008 the Singapore RPA was amended to increase the maximum amount of the aggregate receivables that may be sold from 10.0 million Singapore Dollars to 15.0 Singapore Dollars ($11.0 million at April 30, 2008).

The structure of the transactions provide for a legal true sale, on a revolving basis, of the receivables transferred from the various Greif subsidiaries either (i) to Greif Coordination Center BVBA, which in turn sells the receivables to the respective bank, or (ii) directly to the respective bank. The bank funds an initial purchase price of a certain percentage of eligible receivables based on a formula with the initial purchase price approximating 75 percent to 90 percent of eligible receivables. The remaining deferred purchase price is settled upon collection of the receivables. At the balance sheet reporting dates, we remove from accounts receivable the amount of proceeds received from the initial purchase price since they meet the applicable criteria of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” and continue to recognize the deferred purchase price in its accounts receivable. The receivables are sold on a non-recourse basis with the total funds in the servicing collection accounts pledged to Buyer between the semi-monthly settlement dates. At April 30, 2008, €93.0 million ($145.4 million) of accounts receivable were sold under the RPA and Italian RPA and 8.1 million Singapore Dollars ($6.0 million) of accounts receivable were sold under the Singapore RPA.

At the time the receivables are initially sold, the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets sold are included as a loss on sale and classified as “other expense” in the consolidated statements of income. Expenses associated with the RPA and Italian RPA totaled €1.0 million ($1.6 million) for the three months ended April 30, 2008. Expenses associated with the Singapore RPA were not material to the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2008. Additionally, we perform collections and administrative functions on the receivables sold similar to the procedures it uses for collecting all of its receivables, including receivables that are not sold under the RPA and Italian RPA. The servicing liability for these receivables is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Other

In addition to the borrowings and facilities described above, we had outstanding debt of $53.0 million, comprised of $5.3 million in long-term debt and $47.7 million in short-term borrowings, at April 30, 2008, and $49.3 million, comprised of $33.5 million in long-term debt and $15.8 million in short-term borrowings, at October 31, 2007.

Significant Nonstrategic Timberland Transactions

In connection with one of our 2005 timberland transactions with Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. (“Plum Creek”), Soterra LLC (one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries) received cash and a $50.9 million purchase note payable by an indirect subsidiary of Plum Creek (the “Purchase Note”). Soterra LLC contributed the Purchase Note to STA Timber LLC (“STA Timber”), one of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Purchase Note is secured by a Deed of Guarantee issued by Bank of America, N.A., London Branch, in an amount not to exceed $52.3 million (the “Deed of Guarantee”). STA Timber has issued in a private placement 5.20 percent Senior Secured Notes due August 5, 2020 (the “Monetization Notes”) in the principal amount of $43.3 million. The Monetization Notes are secured by a pledge of the Purchase Note and the Deed of Guarantee. Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries have not extended any form of guaranty of the principal or interest on the Monetization Notes. Accordingly, Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries will not become directly or contingently liable for the payment of the Monetization Notes at any time.

Contractual Obligations

As of April 30, 2008, we had the following contractual obligations (Dollars in millions):


	Payments Due By Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
Long-term debt	$	938.5	$	26.6	$	485.3	$	40.5	$	386.1
Short-term borrowings		49.0		49.0		—		—		—
Non-cancelable operating leases		88.9		10.5		30.7		18.5		29.2
Timber note securitized		70.7		1.1		4.5		4.5		60.6

Total contractual cash obligations	$	1,147.1	$	87.2	$	520.5	$	63.5	$	475.9

Stock Repurchase Program

Our Board of Directors has authorized us to purchase up to four million shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock or any combination of the foregoing. During the first half of 2008, we did not repurchase any shares of Class A Common Stock, but we purchased 178,900 shares of Class B Common Stock. As of April 30, 2008, we had repurchased 2,530,772 shares, including 1,416,752 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,114,020 shares of Class B Common Stock, under this program. The total cost of the shares repurchased from November 1, 2006 through April 30, 2008 was approximately $22.1 million.

Recent Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We will be required to adopt SFAS No. 157 on November 1, 2009 (2010 for us). The provisions of SFAS No. 157 should be applied prospectively to the beginning of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 157 is initially applied, except with respect to certain financial instruments as defined by SFAS No. 157. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. Subsequent changes in fair value of these financial assets and liabilities would be recognized in earnings when they occur. SFAS No. 159 further establishes certain additional disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 159 is effective for our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year beginning on November 1, 2008 (2009 for us), with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, and timing of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 160, “Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” These new standards will significantly change the financial accounting and reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (or minority)

interests in consolidated financial statements. We will be required to adopt SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 on November 1, 2009 (2010 for us). We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” The objective of SFAS 161 is to enhance the current disclosure framework in Statement 133 and improve the transparency of financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 161 requires entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010 (2011 for us). We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 161 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has not been a significant change in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about our market risk from the disclosures contained in the 2007 Form 10-K.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

With the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, Greif’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report:

•

Information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission;

•

Information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and

•

Our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM

1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in the 2007 Form 10-K under Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS


Issuer Purchases of Class A Common Stock

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (1)
November 2007	—			—	1,658,416
December 2007	—			—	1,658,416
January 2008	—			—	1,655,916
February 2008	—			—	1,655,916
March 2008	—			—	1,650,016
April 2008	—			—	1,479,516

	—			—


Issuer Purchases of Class B Common Stock

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (1)
November 2007	—			—	1,658,416
December 2007	—			—	1,658,416
January 2008	2,500	$	59.04	2,500	1,655,916
February 2008	—			—	1,655,916
March 2008	5,900	$	59.04	5,900	1,650,016
April 2008	170,500	$	61.22	170,500	1,479,516

	178,900			178,900

(1)

Our Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program which permits us to purchase up to 4.0 million shares of our Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, or any combination thereof. As of April 30, 2008, the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased is 1,479,516, which may be any combination of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

(a.) Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
10(dd)		Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April 23, 2008, among Greif, Inc. and Greif Spain Holdings, S.L., as borrowers, the various lending institutions named therein, as lenders, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, administrative agent for the lenders.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a - 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a - 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.


		Greif, Inc.
		(Registrant)

Date: June 6, 2008		/s/ Donald S. Huml
		Donald S. Huml, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Signatory)

GREIF, INC.

Form 10-Q

For Quarterly Period Ended April 30, 2008

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
10(dd)		Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April 23, 2008, among Greif, Inc. and Greif Spain Holdings, S.L., as borrowers, the various lending institutions named therein, as lenders, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, administrative agent for the lenders.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a - 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a - 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Exhibit 10(DD)

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of April 23, 2008, is by and among Greif, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), Greif Spain Holdings, S.L., sociedad unipersonal, a private limited liability company organized under the laws of Spain (“European Holdco”), the financial institutions signatory hereto in their capacity as Lenders (as defined below) under the Credit Agreement (as defined below) and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent for the Lenders (“Administrative Agent”).

W I T N E S S E T H :

WHEREAS, Company, European Holdco, certain subsidiaries of Company (together with Company and European Holdco, “Borrowers”), certain financial institutions (the “Lenders”) and Administrative Agent are parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of March 2, 2005 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), pursuant to which the Lenders have provided to Borrowers credit facilities and other financial accommodations; and

WHEREAS, Company desires to (a) increase the amounts of Indebtedness (i) related to Permitted Accounts Receivable Securitizations and (ii) incurred by any Foreign Subsidiary under the Credit Agreement and (b) increase the amount of Capital Expenditures permitted during any fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, Borrowers have requested that Administrative Agent and the Lenders amend the Credit Agreement in certain respects as set forth herein and the Lenders and Administrative Agent are agreeable to the same, subject to the terms and conditions hereof.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. Defined Terms. Terms capitalized herein and not otherwise defined herein are used with the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Credit Agreement.

2. Amendments to Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement is, as of the Fourth Amendment Effective Date, hereby amended as follows:

(a) Section 8.2(b) of the Credit Agreement is amended by (i) deleting the word “a” therein, (ii) replacing the amount $150,000,000 therein with the amount $225,000,000 and (iii) replacing the amount $300,000,000 therein with the amount $375,000,000.

(b) Section 8.2(m) of the Credit Agreement is amended by replacing the amount $35,000,000 therein with the amount $70,000,000.

(c) Section 9.1 of the Credit Agreement is amended by replacing the amount $135,000,000 therein with the amount $175,000,000.

3. Representations and Warranties. In order to induce Administrative Agent and the Lenders to enter into this Amendment, each of Company and European Holdco hereby represents and warrants to Administrative Agent and the Lenders, in each case after giving effect to this Amendment, as follows:

(a) Each of Company and European Holdco has the corporate or other organizational power and authority to execute and deliver this Amendment and to perform its obligations hereunder and has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance by it of this Amendment.

(b) Each of Company and European Holdco has duly executed and delivered this Amendment, and this Amendment constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable in accordance with its terms, except to the extent that the enforceability thereof may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws generally affecting creditors’ rights and by equitable principles (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in equity or at law).

(c) The representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents are true and correct in all material respects at and as of the date hereof as though made on and as of the date hereof (except to the extent expressly made as of a specified date, in which event such representation and warranty is true and correct in all material respects as of such specified date).

(d) Each of Company’s and European Holdco’s execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment and the agreements, documents and instruments executed and delivered pursuant to this Amendment do not and will not (i) contravene any provision of any Requirement of Law applicable to any Credit Party, (ii) conflict with or result in any breach of, or constitute a default under, or result in the creation or imposition of (or the obligation to create or impose) any Lien (except pursuant to the Security Documents) upon any of the property or assets of any Credit Party pursuant to the terms of any Contractual Obligation to which any Credit Party is a party or by which it or any of its property or assets is bound except for such contraventions, conflicts, breaches or defaults that would not be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) violate any provision of any Organizational Document of any Credit Party or (iv) require any approval of stockholders or any material approval or consent of any Person (other than a Governmental Authority) except filings, consents, or notices which have been made, obtained or given.

(e) No material order, consent, approval, license, authorization or validation of, or filing, recording or registration with or exemption by, any Governmental Authority, is required to authorize, or is required in connection with, (i) the execution and delivery of this Amendment or the performance of the obligations hereunder or (ii) the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability of this Amendment or any agreements, documents and instruments executed and delivered pursuant to this Amendment.

(f) No Event of Default or Unmatured Event of Default exists under the Credit Agreement or would exist immediately after giving effect to this Amendment.

-2-

4. Conditions to Effectiveness of Amendment. This Amendment shall become effective on the Business Day (the “Fourth Amendment Effective Date”) each of the following conditions precedent is satisfied:

(a) Execution and Delivery of Amendment. Administrative Agent (or its counsel) shall have received from (A) Lenders constituting the Required Lenders and (B) Company and European Holdco either (i) a counterpart of this Amendment signed on behalf of such party or (ii) written evidence satisfactory to Administrative Agent (which may include telecopy transmission of a signed signature page of this Amendment) that such party has signed a counterpart of this Amendment.

(b) Reaffirmation Agreement. Administrative Agent shall have received a duly executed copy of the Reaffirmation Agreement executed by each Credit Party other than Company and European Holdco in form and substance acceptable to Administrative Agent.

(c) Fees. Company shall have paid (i) the Amendment Fee (as defined in Section 5) to Administrative Agent for distribution to the Consenting Lenders (as defined in Section 5) in the manner set forth in Section 5, (ii) to Administrative Agent and the Lenders all reasonable costs, fees and expenses (including, without limitation, legal fees and expenses of Winston & Strawn LLP and the reasonable costs, fees and expenses referred to in Section 6(a)) payable to Administrative Agent or any other collateral agent or trustee acting for the benefit of the Lenders, as the case may be, and the Lenders to the extent then due.

(d) Adverse Change. On the Fourth Amendment Effective Date, both before and after giving effect to the Amendment, there shall be no facts, events or circumstances then existing and nothing shall have occurred which shall have come to the attention of any of the Lenders which constitutes a Material Adverse Effect.

(e) Litigation. No action, suit or proceeding (including, without limitation, any inquiry or investigation) by any entity (private or governmental) shall be pending or, to the best knowledge of Borrowers, threatened against Company or any of its Subsidiaries or with respect to the Credit Agreement, or any documentation executed in connection therewith or the transactions contemplated thereby (including, without limitation, this Amendment), or which Administrative Agent shall determine would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, and no injunction or other restraining order shall remain effective or a hearing therefor remain pending or noticed with respect to the Credit Agreement, or any documentation executed in connection therewith or the transactions contemplated thereby (including, without limitation, this Amendment), the effect of which would reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.

(f) Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties contained in this Amendment, the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall each be true and correct in all material respects at and as of the Fourth Amendment Effective Date as though made on and as of the Fourth Amendment Effective Date (except to the extent such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a specified date in which event such representations and warranties shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such specified date).

-3-

(g) No Defaults. No Unmatured Event of Default or Event of Default under the Credit Agreement shall have occurred and be continuing.

5. Amendment Fee. In consideration of the execution of this Amendment by the Lenders, Company hereby agrees to pay on the Fourth Amendment Effective Date to each Lender that executes this Amendment on or prior to 5:00 p.m. New York time on April 23, 2008 (each, a “Consenting Lender”), a fee (collectively, the “Amendment Fee”) in an amount equal to $10,000.

6. Miscellaneous. The parties hereto hereby further agree as follows:

(a) Costs, Expenses and Taxes. Company hereby agrees to pay all reasonable fees, costs and expenses of Administrative Agent incurred in connection with the negotiation, preparation and execution of this Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, the reasonable fees and expenses of Winston & Strawn LLP, counsel to Administrative Agent.

(b) Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which counterparts, when so executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original and all of which counterparts, taken together, shall constitute but one and the same Amendment.

(c) Headings. Headings used in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction of this Amendment.

(d) Integration. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement (as amended hereby) constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.

(e) Governing Law. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACT MADE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND FOR ALL PURPOSES SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS AND DECISIONS OF SAID STATE, INCLUDING SECTIONS 5-1401 AND 5-1402 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW BUT EXCLUDING ALL OTHER CHOICE OF LAW AND CONFLICTS OF LAWS RULES.

(f) Binding Effect. This Amendment shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, Borrowers, Administrative Agent, the Lenders and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that no Borrower may assign its rights or obligations hereunder or in connection herewith or any interest herein (voluntarily, by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the Lenders.

(g) Amendment; Waiver. The parties hereto agree and acknowledge that nothing contained in this Amendment in any manner or respect limits or terminates any of the provisions of the Credit Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents other than as expressly set forth herein and further agree and acknowledge that the Credit Agreement (as amended hereby) and each of the other Loan Documents remain and continue in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Except to the extent expressly set forth herein, the execution,

-4-

delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any rights, power or remedy of the Lenders or Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document. No delay on the part of any Lender or Administrative Agent in exercising any of their respective rights, remedies, powers and privileges under the Credit Agreement or any of the Loan Documents or partial or single exercise thereof, shall constitute a waiver thereof. On and after the Fourth Amendment Effective Date each reference in the Credit Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein” or words of like import, and each reference to the Credit Agreement in the Loan Documents and all other documents delivered in connection with the Credit Agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby. Company and European Holdco acknowledge and agree that this Amendment constitutes a “Loan Document” for purposes of the Credit Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 10.1 of the Credit Agreement. None of the terms and conditions of this Amendment may be changed, waived, modified or varied in any manner, whatsoever, except in accordance with Section 12.1 of the Credit Agreement.

[Signature Pages Follow]

-5-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first written above.


GREIF, INC.

By:		/s/ John K. Dieker
Name:		John K. Dieker
Title:		Vice President and Treasurer

GREIF SPAIN HOLDINGS, S.L.

By:		/s/ Pamela J.H. Centofanti
Name:		Pamela J.H. Centofanti
Title:		President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, in its individual capacity and as Administrative Agent

By:		/s/ Anca Trifan
Name:		Anca Trifan
Title:		Director

By:		/s/ Yvonne Tilden
Name:		Yvonne Tilden
Title:		Director

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


Bank of America, N.A.

By:		/s/ William M. Bulger, Jr.
Name:		William M. Bulger, Jr.
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania

By:		/s/ Clifford A. Mull
Name:		Clifford A. Mull
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


Fifth Third Bank

By:		/s/ Brent M. Jackson
Name:		Brent M. Jackson
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


FORTIS CAPITAL CORP

By:		/s/ Douglas Riahi
Name:		Douglas Riahi
Title:		Managing Director

By:		/s/ Steven D. Silverstein
Name:		Steven D. Silverstein
Title:		Director

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


HSBC Bank USA National Association

By:		/s/ Robert J. McArdle
Name:		Robert J. McArdle
Title:		First Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK

By:		/s/ John M. Luehmann
Name:		John M. Luehmann
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


ING CAPITAL LLC

By:		/s/ Robin Van Puyenbroeck
Name:		Robin Van Puyenbroeck
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

By:		/s/ Sean M. Story
Name:		Sean M. Story
Title:		Associate

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:		/s/ Marcel Fournier
Name:		Marcel Fournier
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


National City Bank

By:		/s/ Timothy J. Holmes
Name:		Timothy J. Holmes
Title:		Senior Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


The Northern Trust Company

By:		/s/ Mark E. Taylor
Name:		Mark E. Taylor
Title:		Senior Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement


US Bank, NA

By:		/s/ Keith Walters
Name:		Keith Walters
Title:		Vice President

Greif Fourth Amendment to

Credit Agreement

Section 302 CEO Certification

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Gasser, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greif, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: June 6, 2008		/s/ Michael J. Gasser
		Michael J. Gasser, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal executive officer)

Section 302 CFO Certification

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald S. Huml, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greif, Inc.;

c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: June 6, 2008		/s/ Donald S. Huml
		Donald S. Huml, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal financial officer)

Section 906 CEO Certification

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a – 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of

Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greif, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Gasser, the chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 6, 2008

/s/ Michael J. Gasser

Michael J. Gasser, Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Greif, Inc. and will be retained by Greif, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Section 906 CFO Certification

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Required by Rule 13a – 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of

Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greif, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald S. Huml, the chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 6, 2008

/s/ Donald S. Huml

Donald S. Huml, Executive Vice

President and Chief Financial Officer